//---------------------------------------Links------------------------// http://www.alex11.org/groups/translations/ http://typewith.me/GHOECHy0cf //----------------------------------------Front cover--------------// A personal manual by Erez Elul (namzezam): Peer Owners - Your Net (V1.0) A way to get organized by equally owning the assets/properties of the organization; A business model solving social matters; A bridge to your goals building your silent revolution in/by your unit/network; Doing it all, in different and competitive groups, while reinforcing the individuals in their groups, by the ”ComComIsm” “ComCom" stands for COMmon COMpany - a company for realizing common objectives. More: http://is-with.wikidot.com For the very basic of this concept please try the 6 points in the back side of this manual. “ComComism” is a peaceful way to change what must be changed toward your side - use it for having more individual freedom and power in your group; The assets of any "democratic" organization must be owned equally by all its members! Why? For increasing the power of each individual, for protecting minorities and for protecting against takeover by any single entity and as such it also provides a “litmus paper” as for the end goal inattention of each individual entering an association! As the members in their unit are shareholder having equal number of shares in it - their membership becomes tradable, making their representatives better satisfying them, or suffering the fall of the units' value. The goal of this concept is a stock market for shareholders having equal number of shares and until then this concept is a new one. Examples: In different groups, we the people, can be the peer owners of the (isp of the) Internet, of some bank systems and/or some means of production of renewable energy, while breaking (e.g. by govcomcomizing) the infinite cycle of bailouts and privatization! I cut myself off from the mass democracy, in which i am lost, into groups in which each member is also a peer owner of its assets! The distribution and licensing of this manual is designed for others making it better while earning from doing so - Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0. Distribution's beneficiaries-vat: Author 30%,Translator 5%, Printing 25%,Wholesaler 10%, Retailer 30% //----------------------------------Back cover--------------------------------// ComCom”, standing for Common Company, What is that? • 1. Tradability: Based on a contract, any ComComized unit, being one of the 3: Scomcomized, Icomcomized or Dcomcomized, guarantees equality between its peer members being its owners, sitting at its top and owning equal share of it - like shareholders having equal number of its shares. • 2. The d: Added together, all the peers own one portion of the unit, as the rest of the unit (if any) is owned by ordinary (non-peer) owners and the ratio of the peers' portion is d (as d*100 is the percentage), where d of Scomcomized unit is only once defined. • 3. Layering: Each peer owner is either a person or a ComComized unit, where each ordinary owner of Scomcom is either a person or a legal body. • 4. One position - one owner: Directly or indirectly, holding more than one position in it is forbidden. • 5. Peers' autonomy: The number of peers holding it must be agreed independently amongst themselves. • 6. Recursiveness of the contract: Buyers of any of its shares must agree with all the 17 points establishing any ComComized unit! Hence: • A) One owner alone could never legally possess it (making it a bad pill for the big ones), while B) its proxies/representatives are constantly re-evaluated (since each peer, like a shareholder, can independently exit with a return value while directly re-setting the unit's value) and C) it is more balanced yet dynamic, authentically growing and scalable! • Such units can bring back the commercial aspects for better serving your social matter, strengthening your power with the power of your peers and adding new additional commercial means to realize your own small/big projects/causes/businesses –Wherever is your position in this oligopoly! “It is all about your power - the power of the peers, it is now in your hands - to use the law to work for you and all you need for that is to find your peers; It is as it were to establish your own new peerage, inheritable in contract – not by blood.” Q) In this huge "global village" of 6.8 billions humans, how could we trust the others with whom we are to “swim” and for how long (could/should) we trust them? A) Insure your exit first, then trust yourself sitting at the top of a unit, but only with those having their power exactly like yours! //------------------pargraph 7:---------------// 7. The Personal Agreement for any “ComComized” Ownership: http://tinyurl.com/yhx2ryz : This is a guideline for any personal agreement of ownership between all the owners of a unit being “comcomized”, where the unit (aka a Common Company, ComCom or a comcomized unit) can only be one of the following three: Scomcomized, Icomcomized or Dcomcomize unit and each owner can only be: • either a p-owner (Peer Owner) or a o-owner (Ordinary Owner), **1 ◦ where each p-owner can only be either a person or a ComCom **2 ◦ and each o-owner can only be either a person or an organization, **3 • but only as, directly or indirectly - through any other entity, the owner obtain only one position of ownership in the unit **4 and the owner can at any time trade **5 her/his share in exchange for a valuable thing, but only as the exchange is made with whom already agreed with this agreement and is not made between an outer entity and owner in IcomCom or an outer entity and o-owner in DcomCom, ◦ where the value of the thing being traded (aka the value a share) is a proportional value reflecting the value of the ComCom as a whole, such that d/c (d divided by c) is the exact share owned by each p-owner, **6 ◦ where c (being the count of all p-owners, as c is bigger than one) is the exact number of all p-owners in such ComCom,**7 ◦ where d (being the decentralization property of the organization and as zero is smaller than d and d is smaller than or equal to one) is unchangeable in all the lifetime of the Scomcom, unlike in DcomCom or Icomcom **8 ▪ where d * 100 (d multiplied by 100) is the percentage of the sum of the shares held by all p-owners together, **9 ▪ where (1-d)*100 ((1-d) multiplied by 100) is the percentage of the sum of the shares held by all o-owners together, **10 • and as t=(v*c)/d, (as t equals the product of v multiplied by c after the product is divided by d) **11, where ◦ t is the Total reflected value of the ComCom as a whole, ◦ v is the Value being trade-able for becoming a p-owner, ◦ c is the Count number of exiting p-owners, • and hence n is the number of shares held by each p-owner, where the number of all issued shares is i, as n=(i*d)/c, ◦ and where Dcomcomized unit, unlike Icomcominzed one, allows each of its peers to trade the peer's membership with an outer entity for the price of her/his n shares, as the price and who is the buyer is defined by the peer, where in each of both - the Dcomcomized or Icomcominzed unit, the d is changeable, such that d=(c*n)/i and i=m, where ▪ m is the number of all of privileged members in the unit, of which each • is either peer owner in the unit, • or one, previously being its peer owner, and currently is a holder in its ordinary owner; ▪ each privileged member can always switch back from being non peer to being peer (and hence the unit provides a security net for its member); ▪ each ordinary owner must be held only by privileged members of the unit and canonly be either of the same type as the owned unit, or a Scomcomized unit of which d=1; ▪ the number of issued shares is as the number of privileged members, as i=m; ▪ the value of n is defined only by the authority of the peers, where • n is bigger than 0 and the smaller or equal 1 and its default value is 1. ◦ Only the the authority of the peers (as one group) may independently determine the number of the peers (the c) in a comcomized unit, **12 ▪ as the type (majority of, all of or other the part of the p-owners) of the decision which must be taken for the authority of the peers to take into effect must be unchangeable in the lifetime of the comcom and be known to all owners; **13 All decisions upon any property owned by the ComCom must be either be authorized by the decisions made in a specific procedure known to all owners or be decided in it, where the procedure includes the followings: **14 ▪ Type of presence: answering should those who vote meet online, in person, via representative, or otherwise, if otherwise then what? **15 ▪ Length of Issuing: answering what is the length of time between rising an issue for voting (for gathering opinion of the owners upon the issue and spreading the information related to that issue) and defining the last voting time for decision (for making it valid in the name of the ComCom) , so that the owners can vote upon the issue in all the time defined by the Length of Issuing, **16 ▪ Procedure of voting: answering what is the procedure of making decision: who must be present at it and as it is starting in what, ending in what and what are the steps in between its start and its end, which must be included and what are those which should never be included, such that in its end: the issue would become either valid or invalid to represent or to be act in the name of the ComCom. **17 Footnotes: **1. Unlike the o-owners all the p-owners have and can only have equal share. **2. This p-owner's limitation, which do not allow non comcom organizations to take a p-owner position, constitutes asymmetric conditions for protecting the peers (many) versus the non-peers (few), since ComCom in itself is an organization and in correlation to what/who can be o-owner. **4. This is for providing protection against manipulations made when playing from far by unknown identifies which mostly done as an hostile act against the distinctions made above. **5. The ability to trade the share constitutes the freedom of the individuals from any law made by the collective. Therefore, This freedom is the up most privilege granted to the individuals in the collective. It is here assumed that when having such freedom, better is the evaluation evaluating the collective, when, in the act of transactions, the evaluation is done by the individuals in the collective and versus the others out of the collective. This is why we also believe that comcomism is the most peaceful way to go. **6. 00, c>1 and 0